Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 F.2d 989 - United States v. Swets

United States v. Swets’s Empirical Analysis

563 F.2d 989 · 1977

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 1993

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

90197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Hampton v. United States · Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o the extent that our present opinion is inconsistent with Ryles and Heath, the latter are hereby overruled. We now hold that where the defense of entrapment is injected into a- case, the Government is not required to show that prior to the time the Government’s agent met the defendant the Government had “reasonable grounds” to believe that the defendant was engaged in “unlawful activities.” [Footnote omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(T)he fact that a Government agent affords an opportunity for the commission of an offense and otherwise engages in artifice and stratagem does not constitute entrapment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.