Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 F.3d 357 - Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc.

Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

563 F.3d 357 · 2009

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell · Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip · Mississippi v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A high ratio may be appropriate based on particularly reprehensible conduct[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 700 F. Supp. 2d 1141 - McELGUNN v. CUNA MUT. INS. SOC.
  2. “not a nominal amount that might excuse a higher ratio.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 700 F. Supp. 2d 1141 - McELGUNN v. CUNA MUT. INS. SOC.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.