Garcia v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
563 F.3d 519 · 2009
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 17 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1691 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1691C · 15 U.S.C. § 1691E · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 7 U.S.C. § 2279
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Bowen v. Massachusetts · Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission · Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission · Esch v. Yeutter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the alternative remedy need not provide relief identical to relief under the APA' in order to have preclusive effect.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Bowen , 487 U.S. at 903 , 108 S.Ct. 2722 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he alternative remedy need not provide relief identical to relief under the APA, so long as it offers relief of the 'same genre.' " Garcia v. Vilsack , 563 F.3d 519 , 522 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Ctr. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. , 396 F.3d 1265 , 1272 (D.C. Cir. 2005) ). Applying the "same genre”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.