Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 F.3d 527 - Rasul v. Myers

Rasul v. Myers’s Empirical Analysis

563 F.3d 527 · 2009

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
February 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 17 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 2751 - Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), Mader v. United States (2011)

21 federal appellate · 17 district ·

470200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 801 (Military Justice Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton · Pearson v. Callahan · Scott v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no doubt that RLUIPA's drafters, in changing the definition of 'exercise of religion,' wanted to broaden the scope of the kinds of practices protected by RFRA, not increase the universe of individuals protected by RFRA.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “see nothing in the Supreme Court's [Boumediene ] decision that could possibly affect our disposition of” the plaintiffs' ATS claims alleging violations of the law of nations and”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the exercise of religion under the First Amendment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.