Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 F.3d 663 - Abad v. Bayer Corp.

Abad v. Bayer Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

563 F.3d 663 · 2009

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2022

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

180200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp. · 26 Cal. 3d 588 - Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “heavily influenced by the law of other civil law countries, especially the law of France and of Spain and more especially the Napoleonic Code, which remains the basis of Spanish as well as French law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.