Chee v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc. · Gava v. United States · Finnegan v. Matthews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Secretary's decision not to follow the Ninth Circuit case ... would have been less objectionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.