563 F. Supp. 2d 54 - Miller v. Holzmann’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3129 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3731 (False Claims Act)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · McCarthy v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]laintiffs did not stipulate that neither BHIC nor any predecessor company existed `at the time Contracts 20A, 29, 07 were bid or entered into.' Plaintiffs did not seek to disprove the stipulated fact that BHIC did not exist prior to 1992. Rather, they sought to prove that BHIC, by its own admission, is a direct outgrowth of any entity that did exist when the bid-rigging occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In light of Anderson's explicit status as HII's point-man in Europe for international contracting and his attendance at the December 1988 renegotiation with Fuller, it would be reasonable to infer that if a HII representative attended the May meeting, it would have been Anderson.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]or this kind of generalized testimony, Rule 702 simply requires that: (1) the expert be qualified; (2) the testimony address a subject matter on which the factfinder can be assisted by an expert; (3) the testimony be reliable; and (4) the testimony `fit' the facts of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.