Vore v. Vore’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crowe v. Crowe · Haag v. Haag · Giselbach v. Giselbach · Estate of Brummett Ex Rel. Brummett v. Brummett · Blickenstaff v. Blickenstaff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms of unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vore v. Vore“These guidelines ... may not be used absent a showing of a substantial change in circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cavazzi v. Cavazzi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.