Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 NE2D 536 - Flinn v. State

Flinn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2019

11 state decisions

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · United States v. O'Brien · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hodel v. Indiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any danger that a racketeering conviction could result merely from the commission of two predicate offenses within a five-year period is obviated not only by .the interrelatedness requirement but also by the requirement .that once a pattern of racketeering activity has been established, it must be connected to an interest in or control of .... property or an enterprise, to constitute the offense of corrupt business-influence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]nce a pattern of racketeering activity has been established, it must be connected to an interest in or control of ... property or an enterprise, to constitute the offense of corrupt business influence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “failure to cite to locations in the record where evidentiary errors occurred at trial results in waiver”); Callahan v. State, 527 N.E.2d 1133, 1141 (Ind.1988) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.