Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 NE2D 605 - Owen v. Owen

Owen v. Owen’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2017

12 state decisions

80199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. Bair · Canfield v. Sandock · Marriage of Poret v. Martin · In re Tabak · Isom v. Isom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n those rare cases where the physician-patient privilege is properly invoked, it is incumbent on the party seeking to assert the privilege to identify to the court specifically which documents are believed to remain within the privilege, after which the court will review the contested documents in camera to ascertain their entitlement to the protection of the privilege.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... all matters causally or historically related to that condition, and information which would otherwise be protected from disclosure by the privilege then becomes subject to discovery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “There is no question but that a worsening mental condition may constitute a change in circumstances sufficient to necessitate modification of custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.