Corbin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Nunn v. State (1992), Landress v. State (1992)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Francis v. Franklin · Johnson v. Righetti · Smith v. Illinois · Soto v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Since the trial judge is in the best position to observe the trial proceeding, the trial judge should control the extent of eross-examination and accordingly will be reversed only on an abuse of discretion. [Citation omitted.] To show abuse of discretion, a defendant must demonstrate how he was prejudiced by the counrt's actions." Corbin v. State (1990), Ind., 563 N.E.2d 86, 90 (quoting Johnson v. State (1988), Ind., 518 N.E.2d 1073, 1075 ) (emphasis supplied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Salone v. State“[Where an expert's testimony is based upon the expert's skill or experience rather than on the application of scientific principles, the proponent of the testimony must only demonstrate that the subject matter is related to some field beyond the knowledge of lay persons and the witness possesses sufficient skill, knowledge or experience in the field to assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"A person is not responsible for having engaged in prohibited conduct if, as a result of mental disease or defect, he was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of the conduct at the time of the offense."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eaton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.