Post v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. Williams · Kitchens v. State · Harris v. State · United States v. Saldana · Wimberli v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We would further observe that the trial Court properly sustained defendant’s objection and admonished the jury not to consider the witness’ voluntary remarks. “In Wimberli v. State, Okl.Cr., 536 P.2d 945 (1975), we stated: “1 . . . This Court has previously held that when a trial court admonishes the jury not to consider the remarks of counsel, or a witness, this admonition usually cures an error unless it is of such a nature, after considering the evidence, that the error appears to determine the verdict. See, Kitchens v. State, Okl.Cr., 513 P.2d 1300 (1973). . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.