State v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2006
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Marques · State v. Romero · 13 Wash. App. 782 - State v. Clark · People v. Austin · 18 Utah 2d 292 - State v. Canfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the exclusive function of the jury to weigh the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses, and it is not within the prerogative of this Court to substitute its judgment for that of the fact-finder. This Court should only interfere when the evidence is so lacking and insubstantial that reasonable men could not possibly have reached a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watts“[when the value of property must be determined, the measure of the value is its fair market value at the time and place of the theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Greene“owner [of the property] could expect to receive, and the amount a willing buyer would pay to the true owner for the stolen item.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Greene
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.