Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 Pa. 218 - Commonwealth v. Polo

Commonwealth v. Polo’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · Florida v. Bostick · Michigan v. Long · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Traditionally, this Court has recognized three categories of encounters between citizens and the police. These categories include (1) a mere encounter, (2) an investigative detention, and (3) custodial detentions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an investigative detention since the purpose of the stop ... was for the purpose of conducting a drug interdiction investigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the interruption of the normal activity of a commercial bus by removing it from the stream of traffic at a highway tollbooth”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.