Barnett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 459 So. 2d 793 - Fairchild v. State · Cook v. State · 520 So. 2d 123 - Windham v. State · Robinson v. State · Watson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case the testimony was that Barnett, when in no physical danger, went into both trailers and after fully arming himself, went back out, and in a matter of seconds, at most, shot and killed Harmon. We do not retreat from what we have repeatedly stated, that only in cases where the proof substantiates the accused was not in any danger when he armed himself, and from which the proof will show that he armed himself for the very purpose of shooting the victim, that such an instruction may be properly considered by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hart v. State“The law of Mississippi is liberal on what constitutes manslaughter on the facts, and makes considerable allowance for the frailties of human passion; ... There must not only be passion and anger to reduce a crime to manslaughter, but there must be such circumstances as would indicate that a normal mind would be roused to the extent that the reason is overthrown and that passion usurps the mind destroying judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“of those which had already been accepted. This Court therefore affirms on this issue. III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the conviction is upheld. AFFIRMED. ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, PITTMAN and BLASS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Hemphill cited cases which are irrelevant because they all deal with introduction of confiscated items as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hemphill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.