Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 So. 2d 188 - State v. Stevens

563 So. 2d 188 - State v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis · In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship) · Florida Bar v. Hawkins · Florida Bar v. Schell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A fair reading of the footnote is that by obtaining the defendant's consent to a mistrial prior to ruling on the merits of the motion to suppress, the trial court could overcome the objections of the state regarding loss of right to appellate review resulting from the defense's waiting until trial to make the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.