563 So. 2d 38 - Mayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Finley · Wainwright v. Torna · Murray v. Giarratano · Williams v. Al Lockhart · 416 So. 2d 1109 - Young v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is clear under Alabama law that there is no requirement that indigent petitioners be furnished counsel regarding post-conviction proceedings. Ex parte Cox , 451 So.2d 235 , 237 (Ala. 1983). Because a state prisoner `ha[s] no constitutional right to coram nobis [now Rule 32] counsel, see Pennsylvania v. Finley , 481 U.S. 551 , 555 , 107 S.Ct. 1990 , 1993 , 95 L.Ed.2d 539 (1987), he cannot excuse a procedural default based upon ineffective assistance rendered by that counsel. See [ Wainwright v.] Torna , 455 U.S. [586 ,] 587-88, 102 S.Ct. [1300 ,] 1301-02, [ 71 L.Ed.2d 475 (1982)].' Toles v. Jones , 888 F.2d 95 , 99-100 (11th Cir. 1989)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.