Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 So. 2d 579 - State v. Chambers

563 So. 2d 579 - State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably State v. Egana (1997), 584 So. 2d 356 - State v. Collins (1991)

59 state decisions

300199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bowsher v. Merck & Co. · 425 So. 2d 1222 - State v. Trahan · 414 So. 2d 306 - State v. Fuller · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant’s knowledge that the illegal drugs are in the area; the defendant’s relationship with the person found to be in actual possession; the defendant’s access to the area where the drugs were found; the evidence of recent drug use by the defendant; the defendant’s physical proximity to the drugs; and any evidence that the particular area was frequented by drug users. State v. Tasker, 448 So.2d 1311 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984), writ den. 450 So.2d 644 (La.1984). State v. Chambers, 563 So.2d 579 (La. App. 4th Cir.1990).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the offense intended.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.