563 So. 2d 793 - Mattox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · 433 So. 2d 518 - Florida Bar v. Roberts · Conyers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, Mattox has failed to substantiate his allegation with proof that the sheriff’s office has refused to provide him with a copy. Because Mattox failed to attach a copy of the report to his motion, he therefore was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing based simply upon his allegation that the state knowingly obtained his conviction based upon insufficient evidence. See Conyers v. State, 215 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 749 (Fla.1969).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mattox v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.