Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2001
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Morgan · State v. Black · Morgan v. State · Harrison v. State · Pearson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Next, the defendant’s double jeopardy contention is not tenable. The dual convictions here were legally justified. In our opinion, there were two separate crimes of armed robbery committed by the defendant. There were two victims and both were assaulted and robbed in separate and distinct acts. Different items of property taken belonged individually to each victim. Different evidence was required to establish each offense. In dealing with similar factual circumstances in other cases, our courts have explicitly authorized such dual convictions. Black v. State [State v. Black], 524 S.W.2d 913 (Tenn.1975); Morgan v. State, 220 Tenn. 247 , 415 S.W.2d 879 (1967); Wilkerson v. State, 211 Tenn. 32 , 362 S.W.2d 253 (1962); Wiley v. State, 552 S.W.2d 410 (Tenn.Cr.App.1977).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grooms
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.