Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 SW2D 819 - Bean v. State

Bean v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2004

10 state decisions

301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basaldua v. State · Morgan v. State · Woods v. State · Faurie v. State · Morales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Records coming before this Court, particularly from Harris County, have demonstrated a growing tendency to bifurcate these proceedings, [pleas of guilty] In most of these cases the punishment is not assessed at the time of the guilty plea and the cases have been reset for the purpose of obtaining a pre-sentence investigation. At the second hearing, instead of the court passing on the issue of probation, the courts have been permitting the defense to reopen and present evidence as to the facts surrounding the offense as well as presenting reputation witnesses. The State often counters with other evidence concerning the offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““The use of presentence investigation reports is to be commended. The only reference to such reports, however, to be found in the Code of Criminal Procedure is in Article 42.12, Section 4, V.A.C.C.P. The proper use of such reports is to enable the trial court to pass on the issue of probation, not to determine the punishment to be assessed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.