Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 U.S. 277 - Sossamon v. Texas

Sossamon v. Texas’s Empirical Analysis

563 U.S. 277 · 2011

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 8 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Sossamon v. Texas (2011), United States v. Seidman (1998)

21 federal appellate · 8 district · 8 state decisions

98020112020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 15 U.S.C. § 6309 · 15 U.S.C. § 797 · 16 U.S.C. § 973I · 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 2 U.S.C. § 437G (§ 309 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971)

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Bell v. Hood · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a statute is susceptible of multiple plausible interpretations, including one preserving immunity, we will not consider a State to have waived its sovereign immunity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[C]lear statement rules ensure Congress does not, by broad or general language, legislate on a sensitive topic inadvertently or without due deliberation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he context here--where the defendant is a sovereign--suggests, if anything, that monetary damages are not 'suitable' or 'proper.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.