Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 563 U.S. 421 - CIGNA Corp. v. Amara

CIGNA Corp. v. Amara’s Empirical Analysis

563 U.S. 421 · 2011

Citation profile

160
cited by 160 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 20 district · 3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1022 (§ 102 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1024 (§ 104 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1054 (§ 204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1102 (§ 402 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Varity Corporation v. Howe · Mertens v. Hewitt Associates · Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. Knudson · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 160 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]quity courts possessed the power to provide monetary 'compensation' for a loss resulting from a trustee's breach of duty, or to prevent the trustee's unjust enrichment,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he fact that ... relief takes the form of a money payment does not remove it from the category of traditionally equitable relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by a participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary (A) to enjoin any act or practice which violates any provision of this subchapter or the terms of the plan, or (B) to obtain other appropriate equitable relief (i) to redress such violations or (ii) to enforce any provisions of this subchapter or the terms of the plan ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.