Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

564 F.2d 199

Docket No. 76-2289.

United States v. Astroff

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Nov. 16, 1977.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1977-11-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Wainwright v. Sykes · Jiminez v. Estelle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC · Decided 1977-11-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1997

8 federal appellate ·

60197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Martin G. Weinberg, James W. Lawson, Boston, Mass., for defendants-appellants.

James R. Gough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, George A. Kelt, Jr., Donald L. Lambright, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 8, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 556 F.2d 1369)

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/564/f2d/199 · .json · Public domain