Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 F.2d 329 - Bennett v. Campbell

Bennett v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

564 F.2d 329 · 1977

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 1989
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States v. Gipson · Apton v. Wilson · Mark v. Groff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in the rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.