Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 F.2d 898 - Mack v. Cupp

Mack v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis

564 F.2d 898 · 1977

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
March 2014
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Locks v. Gw Sumner (1983), Larry James Gamble v. State of Oklahoma (1978)

21 federal appellate · 2 district ·

16019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Stone v. Powell · Nardone v. United States · Walker v. City of Birmingham · Cohen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he court's mistaken recitation of the facts, even assuming arguendo that it resulted in an incorrect decision, is not enough in and of itself to establish that Mack's claims were not fully and fairly considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Locks v. Gw Sumner
  2. “Under Stone a federal district court may not relitigate a fourth amendment issue tried fully and fairly in a state court, regardless of its view of the correctness of the state decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Abell v. Raines
  3. “the issue of whether the state court correctly applied the law of search and seizure is apparently totally irrelevant as long as state procedures were fair.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gabryelski v. Smith

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.