In re Sibley’s Empirical Analysis
564 F.3d 1335 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2021
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 4 U.S.C. § 101
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. Morgan · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Selling v. Radford · United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the procedure was so lacking in notice or opportunity to be heard as to constitute a deprivation of due process; or (2) there was such an infirmity of proof establishing the misconduct as to give rise to the clear conviction that this Court could not, consistent with its duty, accept as final the conclusion on that subject; or (3) the imposition of the same discipline by this Court would result in grave injustice; or (4) the misconduct warrants substantially different discipline.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Because administration of the relevant oaths is a question of state law, this court cannot look beyond the controlling decisions of the Florida state courts.”). 8 . Respondent argues that this deprived him of the ability to question these judges about their alleged hostility toward him. 9 . We noted in Shieh that the need for sworn testimony was obviated by the availability of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In Re Sibley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.