Waters v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
564 F.3d 1355 · 2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982)
Relies on Ellis v. England · Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,034 Prestige Casualty Company v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee · Hagans v. Glens Falls Insurance · The Travelers Insurance Company v. Transport Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Federal Insurance Company, Third-Party · Howard v. Quality Xpress, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, considering all evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-movant.” Waters v. Miller, 564 F.3d 1355, 1356 (11th Cir.2009). 2 . Dr. Nields indicated that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.