Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 F.3d 862 - Ayele v. Holder

Ayele v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

564 F.3d 862 · 2009

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2024

11 federal appellate ·

130200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Gonzales v. Thomas · Capric v. Ashcroft · Jie Lin v. Ashcroft · Niam v. Ashcroft · Gebremichael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a reasonable probability that she will be singled out individually for persecution or that there is a pattern or practice of persecution of an identifiable group, to which [she] belongs, such that [her] fear is reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.