Pate-Fires v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
564 F.3d 935 · 2009
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Parsons v. Heckler · Rohan v. Chater · Robinson v. Barnhart · Robert J. Lauer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]erious symptoms ... or any serious impairment in social, occupational or school functioning. ...” Id. (quoting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 32 (4th ed. Am. Psychiatric Ass’n 1994)) (emphasis added). Here, Jones has not presented a”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) If the claimant is engaged in substantial gainful activity, disability benefits are denied. (2) If the claimant is not engaged in substantial gainful activity, her medical condition is evaluated to determine whether her impairment, or combination of impairments, is medically severe. If the impairment is not severe, benefits are denied. (3) If the impairment is severe, it is compared with the listed impairments the Secretary acknowledges as precluding substantial gainful activity. If the impairment is equivalent to one of the listed impairments, the claimant is disabled. (4) If there is no conclusive determination of severe impairment, then the Secretary determines whether the claimant is prevented from performing the work she performed in the past. If the claimant is able to perform her previous work, she is not disabled. (5) If the claimant cannot do her previous work, the Secretary must determine whether she is able to perform other work in the national economy given her age, education, and work experience.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[s]erious symptoms... or any serious impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martise v. Astrue · Woods v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.