Askins v. Belissary

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-04-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2014

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-04-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Latasha Lorraine Askins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Askins’ claims of retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askins v. Belissary, No. 4:12-cv-01856-RBH, 2014 WL 507279 (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.