Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 F. Supp. 1200 - Abbott v. Shaffer

564 F. Supp. 1200 - Abbott v. Shaffer’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
December 1993
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1635 (§ 125 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1639 (§ 129 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. · Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. · Wachtel v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The Creditor] acknowledges that upon notice of rescission § 1635(b) requires the creditor to return to the obligor “any money or property given as earnest money, down payment, or otherwise,” but notes that upon performance • of its obligations § 1635(b) then requires the obligor to tender to the creditor any property the creditor has delivered to the obligor. According to [the Creditor], [the Debtor] would therefore be required to return the $5,000 loan. [The Debtor], however, in her notice of rescission, implied that she would not comply with [the Creditor’s] interpretation of § 1635(b). She stated that her only obligation under § 1635(b) was to return the car she had received in the underlying transaction. Since [the Creditor] had already repossessed the car, she felt that her obligations under § 1635(b) were satisfied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does no more than create a rebuttable presumption of delivery thereof”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.