Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 F. Supp. 1459 - Nutty v. Universal Engineering Corp.

564 F. Supp. 1459 - Nutty v. Universal Engineering Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 88 Ill. 2d 407 - Knox College v. Celotex Corp. · 85 Ill. 2d 146 - Witherell v. Weimer · Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co. · Bomba v. W. L. Belvidere, Inc. · Murphy v. White Hen Pantry Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a cause of action has arisen in a state or territory out of this State, or in a foreign country, and, by the laws thereof, an action thereon cannot be maintained by reason of the lapse of time, an action thereon shall not be maintained in this State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.