Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 FSUPP 1524 - Sibert v. Flint

Sibert v. Flint’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2001

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

30198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · McGee v. International Life Insurance · Shaffer v. Heitner · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Consideration of personal jurisdiction under subsection (b)(1) necessarily invokes the limitation in subsection (a) that the cause of action arise from an act enumerated in (b)(1). Although subsection (a) does not provide any substantive limitation which exeeds that imposed by the Due Process Clause, see Malinow v. Eberly, 322 F.Supp. 594, 598-600 (D.Md.1971), it does require that ‘some purposeful acts [have been] performed by the defendant in Maryland in relation to one or more of the elements of the cause of action,’ id. at 599 . Accord Snyder v. Hampton Industries, Inc., 521 F.Supp. 130, 145-46 (D.Md.1981); McLaughlin v. Copeland, 435 F.Supp. 513, 522-23 (D.Md.1977).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The acts of a corporate representative, transacting corporate business, are not a basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the corporate representative in his individual capacity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If jurisdiction over a person is based solely upon this section, he may be sued only on a cause of action arising from any act enumerated in this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.