564 So. 2d 1007 - Weaver v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “). Therefore, because the testimony concerning the identification of the appellant by the eyewitness, Alphonso Reese, was proper, see discussion at Issue V herein, and because Evans's testimony was admitted without objection, we find no reversible error in the trial court's allowing Detective Jacobs to testify concerning statements made by these witnesses. X The appellant argues that the trial court erred by refusing to give his requested jury instruction on reasonable doubt. The defendant's requested charge read as follows:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 596 So. 2d 16 - Huff v. State

2. “had already admitted to making every material allegation contained in the arrest warrant and affidavit, without objection by the appellant, the admission of those documents into evidence was without error”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 596 So. 2d 16 - Huff v. State

3. “is not a proper ground for reversal under Alabama law. Hammond v. State, 497 So.2d 558 , 562-64 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); McClellan v. State, 484 So.2d 1150, 1152-53, 152-53 (Ala.Cr.App.1985).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 581 So. 2d 1136 - Kirby v. State