564 So. 2d 1023 - Self v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Three elements are necessary to establish possession of a controlled substance. These are: (1) actual or potential physical control, (2) intention to exercise dominion and (3) external manifestations of intent and control."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'In order to establish a violation of the Sixth Amendment [with regard to conflicts of interests], a defendant who raised no objection at trial must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.' Cuyler v. Sullivan , 446 U.S. 335 , 348 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 , 1718 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980). A defendant who asserts a conflict of interest claim need not prove prejudice since prejudice is presumed if he 'demonstrates that counsel”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Thus, ‘[t]o establish constructive possession, the state must show that the accused had dominion and control of the illegal substance itself or of the premises on which the substance was found. Grubbs v. State, 462 So.2d 995 (Ala.Crim.App.1984); Franklin v. State, 437 So.2d 609 (Ala.Crim.App.1983).’ Hamilton v. State, 496 So.2d 100, 103 (Ala.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied (Ala.1986). ‘Constructive possession may be determined by weighing facts tending to support a defendant’s necessary control over the substances against facts which demonstrate a lack of dominion and control.’ Korreckt, 507 So.2d at 564 (quoting Crane v. State, 401 So.2d 148, 149 (Ala.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 401 So.2d 151 (Ala.1981)).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rawls v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.