Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 SO2D 1057 - Bolender v. Dugger

Bolender v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lockett v. Ohio · Gardner v. Florida · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Scharffe v. Perkins · Maynard v. Cartwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he state established corpus delicti in this case, the quoted statement merely recited the obvious, and the instructions did not direct a verdict for the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[h]abeas corpus is not to be used to relitigate issues determined in a prior appeal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “fully considered the propriety of Bolender's sentences on direct appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.