Gianolio v. Markham’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 518 So. 2d 1270 - Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion Hrs Nonlawyer Counselor · 488 So. 2d 62 - Williams v. State · First Commerce Realty Investors v. Peninsular Title Ins. Co. · 354 So. 2d 368 - Straughn v. Tuck · 268 So. 2d 407 - Hausman v. Rudkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The term `primarily' simply signifies that the agricultural use must be the most significant activity on the land where the land supports diverse activities. The terms `bona fide' as used in the statute impose the requirement that the agricultural use be real, actual, of a genuine nature as opposed to a sham or deception.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[s]uch other factors as may from time to time become applicable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“However, although it is presumed that the determinations of property appraisers are correct, the presumption is rebuttable. If the taxpayer can demonstrate that the property appraiser abused his discretion or failed to follow the required statutory procedures, his determination will not be entitled to the presumption of correctness. 51 Fla.Jur.2d Taxation § 18:86 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.