564 So. 2d 1138 - Dixson v. Cantrell’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 73 So. 2d 274 - Bennett v. Bennett · Gimenez v. State · 559 So. 2d 1211 - Izmery v. Izmery · 479 So. 2d 269 - Hood v. Hood · Peaden v. Slatcoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general policies of this act apply to the international area. The provisions of this act relating to the recognition and enforcement of custody decrees of other states apply to decrees involving legal institutions similar in nature to custody institutions, rendered by appropriate authorities of other nations if reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard were given to all affected persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stock v. Stock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.