Knauf v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 171 So. 2d 229 - State Road Department v. Brill · Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics v. Lee · 452 So. 2d 582 - Page v. Ezell · Martin v. Drylie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is apparent the trial court's order did not determine jurisdiction over appellant, but rather merely allowed discovery to continue so that appellee could attempt to prove the allegations of her complaint, i.e., that when appellant operated on her, he was doing so as an agent or employee of Shands and was, thus, subject to suit and liability. As such the trial court's order denying the motion to dismiss is not appealable as a non-final order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.