Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

564 So. 2d 254

Eggers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-07-23

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2007

3 state decisions

Relies on Brammer v. State · 557 So. 2d 926 - Harden v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-07-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WIGGINTON, Judge.

¶1Appellant appeals a judgment and sentences finding him guilty pursuant to his nolo contendere plea of six counts of armed burglary of a dwelling and one count of aggravated assault with a firearm. We affirm his convictions and sentences except that we remand for correction of the written sentence imposed for aggravated assault with a firearm.

¶2At the sentencing hearing, the trial judge orally sentenced appellant on the aggravated assault with a firearm count to five years in prison including a three-year mandatory minimum, the maximum allowable sentence. However, the written sentence on that count reflects imposition of a 17-year term followed by five years probation, a sentence which exceeds the maximum allowable by law. Therefore, we remand for correction of the written sentence on the aggravated assault with the firearm count to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Harden v. State, 557 So.2d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Brammer v. State, 554 So.2d 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

¶3AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of sentence consistent with this opinion.

BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.
/564/so2d/254 · .json · Public domain