Robbins v. State

John Anderson ROBBINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Richard Dugger, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 1990.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-07-23

Relies on 511 So. 2d 554 - White v. Dugger · Dettman v. Reid ex rel. Reid

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-07-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2012

6 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *257 John Anderson Robbins, pro se.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellees.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Habeas corpus is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals on issues which were raised or should have been raised on appeal or could have been challenged pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850; White v. Duggar,511 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1987). The issues raised by appellant were adequately addressed by this court in Robbins v. State,370 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Defendant is procedurally barred from seeking further relief by failing to meet the time constraints enumerated in Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.

¶5Appellees request for certification is denied.

¶6Affirmed.

¶7WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.