Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

564 So. 2d 270

Docket No. 89-2660.

Letourneau v. Letourneau

James D. LETOURNEAU, Appellant, v. Juanita D. LETOURNEAU, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-07-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-07-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2019

9 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jack A. Norris, Jr., Fort Pierce, for appellant.

¶2Robert V. Schwerer of Brennan, Hayskar, Jefferson & Gorman, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm as to all issues, except for that provision of the final judgment which states:

All visitation rights of the Husband shall be exercised only upon the express approval of the Wife, and the Wife shall have the right to direct and control visitations as the circumstances dictate.

¶5We remand for the trial judge to establish a schedule of reasonable visitation for the Husband created by the exercise of the court's discretion and not the wife's.

¶6AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.

¶7DOWNEY, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

/564/so2d/270 · .json · Public domain