Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

564 So. 2d 272

Graham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-07-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1992

3 state decisions

Relies on 444 So. 2d 947 - Jenkins v. State · 519 So. 2d 618 - Mays v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

¶1The defendant, Steven Graham, appeals his convictions and sentences of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and carrying a concealed firearm. The defendant’s only meritorious point on appeal concerns costs. We agree that the trial court erred in imposing costs without affording the defendant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike the imposition of costs and remand to the trial court, which may reimpose costs if the appropriate notice and opportunity to be heard is afforded the defendant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

¶2Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
/564/so2d/272 · .json · Public domain