564 So. 2d 594 - Townsend v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 542 So. 2d 984 - Romani v. State · Bundy v. Rudd · 531 So. 2d 364 - Capurso v. Dibling · 536 So. 2d 1190 - Hill v. Honorable Mark a. Speiser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[wjhether a motion for disqualification is sufficient or not, the judge shall not pass on the truth of the allegations nor adjudicate the question of disqualification, [citations omitted] ... The judge’s comments exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry. It was error for him to continue in the case. Reversed and remanded for a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.