Hill v. Feder’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 497 So. 2d 240 - Fischer v. Knuck · 565 So. 2d 1332 - MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc. · Bundy v. Rudd · Brown v. Rowe · 322 So. 2d 1 - Department of Revenue v. Golder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a judge has looked beyond the mere legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and attempted to refute the charges of partiality, he has then exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone established grounds for his disqualification. Our disqualification rule, which limits the trial judge to a bare determination of legal sufficiency, was expressly designed to prevent what occurred in this ease — the creation of ‘an intolerable adversary atmosphere’ between the trial judge and the litigant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shumpert v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.