Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 SO2D 612 - Livingston v. State

Livingston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 542 So. 2d 1330 - In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 · 427 So. 2d 161 - Sherrod v. Franza · 389 So. 2d 610 - Florida Bar · Duggar v. State · 436 So. 2d 420 - Sharif v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o claim benefit under this provision, the crimes must be consolidated before the normal time period applicable to misdemeanors has expired.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Alvarez v. State · 934 So. 2d 659 - Brady v. State
  2. ““Jurisdictional problems arise when speedy trial time runs, and it cannot be ‘revived’ merely by the prosecutor’s consolidating it or joining it with a felony count, whether or not the prosecutor did so in good faith.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Goldman v. State
  3. “When a felony and a misdemeanor are consolidated for disposition in circuit court, the misdemeanor shall be governed by the same time period applicable to the felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 863 So. 2d 168 - State v. Robbins

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.