Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 So. 2d 616 - Barfield v. State

564 So. 2d 616 - Barfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 504 So. 2d 392 - Williams v. State · 530 So. 2d 53 - State v. Jones · 554 So. 2d 506 - State v. Simpson · 553 So. 2d 701 - Gibson v. State · 553 So. 2d 702 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DOES THE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY OF CRIMES ALONE PROVIDE A VALID REASON FOR DEPARTURE FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES WITHOUT A FINDING OF A PERSISTENT PATTERN OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT?”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Barfield v. State · Forney v. State
  2. “`another Trafficking in Cocaine offense within a very short time of his release from prison'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Barfield v. State · Forney v. State
  3. “continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Barfield v. State · 573 So. 2d 429 - Lipscomb v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.