Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

564 So. 2d 778

State v. Ratcliff

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1990

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1990-06-20

Relies on 412 So. 2d 1335 - State v. Bell · State v. Brown · 438 So. 2d 635 - State v. Wilson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-06-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant, charged with one count of forgery' and one count of issuing worthless checks totaling $1,037.27, pled guilty to the latter charge. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the state dismissed the forgery count and agreed to a sentence of no more than five years.

¶2The trial court imposed a sentence of five years at hard labor, suspended execution, and placed defendant on supervised probation for five years subject to conditions including restitution and successful completion of a drug treatment program.

¶3Defendant now appeals the sentence as being excessive.

¶4When a court imposes a sentence within the limits to which the defendant has agreed in accepting a plea bargain, he cannot complain of excessiveness. State v. Bell, 412 So.2d 1335 (La.1982); State v. Lewis, 564 So.2d 739 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990); State v. Wilson, 438 So.2d 635 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983); State v. Brown, 427 So.2d 1284 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983).

¶5CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED.

/564/so2d/778 · .json · Public domain