Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 SO2D 982 - Wade v. Clark

Wade v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2012

5 state decisions

30199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 455 So. 2d 863 - Ex Parte McLendon · 520 So. 2d 534 - Benton v. Benton · Smith v. Smith · 399 So. 2d 846 - Patterson v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Evidence of `indiscreet' conduct may be considered as a factor in custody modification actions; however, custody will not be modified where the party seeking the change fails to establish a substantial detriment[al] effect on the welfare of the child as a result of the `indiscreet' conduct. Here, the record is devoid of any evidence that tends to show that the mother's activities were in any way detrimental to [the child]. The record is similarly devoid of any evidence tending to show that a change in custody would `materially promote' [the child]'s best interest and welfare. "The father had the burden of showing that the mother's living arrangements had a detrimental effect on the child and that transferring custody to him would `materially promote' the welfare and best interests of the child. This he failed to do. "Where evidence is heard ore tenus by a trial court, the court's findings will not be disturbed unless plainly and palpably wrong. Here, the evidence simply does not warrant a change in custody. We find, therefore, that the trial court erred in transferring custody from the mother to the father."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This requires a showing that the positive good brought about by the modification would more than offset the inherently disruptive effect caused by uprooting the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.